euroliquid
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
| euroliquid [2012/08/17 12:13] – [Further Steps] lynx | euroliquid [2012/08/31 16:40] – robotica | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants. | To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants. | ||
| - | ======= Possible Further Steps ======= | + | == Possible Further Steps == |
| The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | ||
| Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
| LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | ||
| - | ==== Euroliquid Organization ==== | + | ===== Euroliquid Organization |
| Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
| - | === Principles: === | + | ==== Principles: |
| - Inclusivity | - Inclusivity | ||
| - partecipated democracy | - partecipated democracy | ||
| Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
| - Incorruptible by design | - Incorruptible by design | ||
| - | ===== Debate | + | === Debate === |
| The two chamber model that follows below has been developed by Robotica. It is being discussed as the legitimacy of a first-come-first-served chamber isn't very clear. We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as it models the probabilities of acceptance. | The two chamber model that follows below has been developed by Robotica. It is being discussed as the legitimacy of a first-come-first-served chamber isn't very clear. We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as it models the probabilities of acceptance. | ||
| - | === Structure === | + | ==== Structure |
| Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones. | Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones. | ||
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
| - | === Member Weights === | + | ==== Member Weights |
| Member weights is the most delicate argument of PP-EU model. | Member weights is the most delicate argument of PP-EU model. | ||
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/euroliquid.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/08 15:44 by bastian