User Tools

Site Tools


euroliquid

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
euroliquid [2012/08/31 16:36] roboticaeuroliquid [2012/08/31 17:03] – [Principles:] robotica
Line 53: Line 53:
 To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants. To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants.
  
-======= Possible Further Steps =======+== Possible Further Steps ==
  
 The lynX' vision of things is documented on http://my.pages.de/euroliquid whereas Robotica's approach follows: The lynX' vision of things is documented on http://my.pages.de/euroliquid whereas Robotica's approach follows:
  
-=== Preamble ===+ 
 +===== Euroliquid Structure ===== 
 + 
 +==== Preamble ====
 This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress". :) This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress". :)
  
Line 94: Line 97:
 LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it.
  
-==== Euroliquid Organization ====+==== Organization ====
  
  
Line 102: Line 105:
  
  
-=== Principles: ===+==== Principles: ====
   - Inclusivity   - Inclusivity
   - partecipated democracy   - partecipated democracy
Line 109: Line 112:
   - Incorruptible by design   - Incorruptible by design
  
-===== Debate =====+=== Debate ===
  
-The two chamber model that follows below has been developed by Robotica. It is being discussed as the legitimacy of a first-come-first-served chamber isn't very clear. We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as it models the probabilities of acceptance.+The two chamber model that follows below has been developed to work around the weight assignment to each country /party individuals  
 +We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as any other issue of this model.
  
-=== Structure ===+==== Structure ====
  
 Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones. Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones.
Line 185: Line 189:
  
 \\ \\
-=== Subscription and Certification ===+==== Subscription and Certification ====
  
 Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates. Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates.
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/euroliquid.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/08 15:44 by bastian