euroliquid
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
euroliquid [2012/08/31 16:36] – robotica | euroliquid [2020/12/08 15:40] – Update bastian | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
===== the working group ===== | ===== the working group ===== | ||
- | The meeting on 2012-05-17 initiated | + | There is since 2012 the planning and forming of a European Liquid Feedback instance to develop a //best common denominator// |
If you are interested in participating in this working group here are more details: | If you are interested in participating in this working group here are more details: | ||
^ Wiki | http:// | ^ Wiki | http:// | ||
- | ^ Mailing list | [[pp-eu.euroliquid@lists.pp-international.net|pp-eu.euroliquid@lists.pp-international.net]] | | + | ^ Mailing list | [https://lists.european-pirateparty.eu/ |
- | ^ ML registration | http://lists.pp-international.net/ | + | ^ ML registration | pp-eu.euroliquid@lists.european-pirateparty.eu |
===== current state ===== | ===== current state ===== | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The Italian PP has developed a Bootstrap Proposal as provided below which allows to use it to shape its own future configuration from inside. This plan has been approved by the Permanent General Assembly of the PP-IT, which is itself implemented in a Liquid Feedback instance. | The Italian PP has developed a Bootstrap Proposal as provided below which allows to use it to shape its own future configuration from inside. This plan has been approved by the Permanent General Assembly of the PP-IT, which is itself implemented in a Liquid Feedback instance. | ||
- | |||
- | A survey in the German national LQFB has produced [[https:// | ||
===== Bootstrap Proposal ===== | ===== Bootstrap Proposal ===== | ||
Long term set-up principles: | Long term set-up principles: | ||
- | * For transparency, | + | * For transparency, |
- | * Participants are politicians thus bound to transparency. Their realnames | + | * Participants are politicians thus bound to transparency. Their real names and affiliations are displayed in their public profiles. Further data is optional. |
* The database shall be downloadable in its entirety so anyone can set up a mirror of it. | * The database shall be downloadable in its entirety so anyone can set up a mirror of it. | ||
* Should the European Pirates be doubtful of the Italian administration, | * Should the European Pirates be doubtful of the Italian administration, | ||
- | The euroliquid | + | The Euroliquid |
- | * We only create one area called "euroliquid | + | * We only create one area called "Euroliquid |
- | * We only admit one delegate per partipating | + | * We only admit one delegate per participating |
* We only create one voting-policy which is 100%-majority also known as consensus. | * We only create one voting-policy which is 100%-majority also known as consensus. | ||
* To even start the debate, the quorum is at 50/100 - so the majority of participants needs to agree that something needs to be debated. | * To even start the debate, the quorum is at 50/100 - so the majority of participants needs to agree that something needs to be debated. | ||
Line 44: | Line 42: | ||
* How to handle participation of non-EU members. | * How to handle participation of non-EU members. | ||
* How to handle multi-ethnic/ | * How to handle multi-ethnic/ | ||
- | * Certification and administration procedures for slowly growing the number of participants: | + | * Certification and administration procedures for slowly growing the number of participants: |
* Suitable "no protection" | * Suitable "no protection" | ||
- | * Develop the policies for long-term | + | * Develop the policies for long-term |
* Consider long haul policies for longer debates and majority vote options. | * Consider long haul policies for longer debates and majority vote options. | ||
- | The euroliquid | + | The Euroliquid |
To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants. | To achieve that we will have to wait for newer versions of the software that allow for weighted voting of participants. Until then we do the weighting by a counted number of participants. We can slowly grow the system into the hundreds of Pirate participants per country and still be weighted by a fair formula that respects big and small countries - and we can decide together when and how to do this. The speed at which we move there depends on the priority all the parties give to it and provide for accreditations of further participants. | ||
- | ======= Possible Further Steps ======= | + | == Possible Further Steps == |
The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | ||
- | === Preamble === | + | |
+ | ===== Euroliquid Model ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Preamble | ||
This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress" | This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress" | ||
Line 70: | Line 71: | ||
the invitation is to all the world wide Pirate Parties because in the Euroliquid platform the non-eu countries have a voice in EU foreign policy. | the invitation is to all the world wide Pirate Parties because in the Euroliquid platform the non-eu countries have a voice in EU foreign policy. | ||
- | The partecipation is open, in Euroliquid are welcome | + | The partecipation is open, in Euroliquid are welcome all the pirates interested in this project. |
- | all the pirates interested in this project. | + | |
=== When === | === When === | ||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
=== Where === | === Where === | ||
^ Permanent Assembly | ^ Permanent Assembly | ||
- | ^ Location | + | ^ Location |
=== LiquidFeedback === | === LiquidFeedback === | ||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | ||
- | ==== Euroliquid | + | ==== Organization ==== |
Line 102: | Line 102: | ||
- | === Principles: === | + | ==== Principles: |
- Inclusivity | - Inclusivity | ||
- partecipated democracy | - partecipated democracy | ||
Line 109: | Line 109: | ||
- Incorruptible by design | - Incorruptible by design | ||
- | ===== Debate | + | === Debate === |
- | The two chamber model that follows below has been developed | + | The two chamber model that follows below has been developed |
+ | We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as any other issue of this model. | ||
- | === Structure === | + | ==== Structure |
Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones. | Most important for an healthy structure is the capacity to balance the legitimate representativeness of bigger parties and at the same time to give a voice to the smaller ones. | ||
Line 158: | Line 159: | ||
* No exception, no complicated rules to remember, easy to understand it. | * No exception, no complicated rules to remember, easy to understand it. | ||
* Reach the goal: balance representativeness of bigger members and give a voice to the smaller ones. | * Reach the goal: balance representativeness of bigger members and give a voice to the smaller ones. | ||
- | * Alredy used for seats distribution of European Parliament ([[euroliquid: | + | * Alredy used for seats distribution of European Parliament ([[euroliquid: |
* Has strong [[euroliquid: | * Has strong [[euroliquid: | ||
Line 185: | Line 186: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | === Subscription and Certification === | + | ==== Subscription and Certification |
Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates. | Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates. | ||
Line 215: | Line 216: | ||
Almost anonymous means that the representers have the autority to ask informations about any pirate to their secretariat to verify if it is real. | Almost anonymous means that the representers have the autority to ask informations about any pirate to their secretariat to verify if it is real. | ||
+ | ==== Chamber of Representers Units ==== | ||
+ | LiquidFeedback can be organized in directory tree to allow selective partecipation voting to the core EU members, to European envolved menbers till the observers depending on the scope of the votation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Units == | ||
+ | * Members | ||
+ | * EU Members | ||
+ | * EFTA Members | ||
+ | * Acceding EU Members | ||
+ | * Observers (Europe) | ||
+ | * Observers (non Europe) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Chamber of Pirates Units ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The chamber of pirates allows to any individual pirate to propose and debeate inside each country /party unit about any issue regarding PP-EU: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The results of those issues must be proposed by their representers to the Chamber of Representers in order to be ratified according to the weights of each party member. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Units == | ||
+ | * EU Pirates | ||
+ | * Germany | ||
+ | * France | ||
+ | * United Kingdom | ||
+ | * Italy | ||
+ | * Spain | ||
+ | * Catalunya | ||
+ | * Poland | ||
+ | * Romania | ||
+ | * Netherlands | ||
+ | * Belgium | ||
+ | * Czech Republic | ||
+ | * Greece | ||
+ | * Hungary | ||
+ | * Portugal | ||
+ | * Sweden | ||
+ | * Austria | ||
+ | * Bulgaria | ||
+ | * Finland | ||
+ | * Denmark | ||
+ | * Slovakia | ||
+ | * Ireland | ||
+ | * Lithuania | ||
+ | * Latvia | ||
+ | * Slovenia | ||
+ | * Cyprus | ||
+ | * Estonia | ||
+ | * Luxembourg | ||
+ | * Malta | ||
+ | |||
+ | * EFTA Pirates | ||
+ | * Iceland | ||
+ | * Liechtenstein | ||
+ | * Norway | ||
+ | * Switzerland | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Acceding EU Pirates | ||
+ | * Croatia | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Candidates for EU Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Other European Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Worldwide Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Policy Poll ===== | ||
+ | by Nuno Cardoso | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just to make it clearer, there is single spreadsheet with several sheets. | ||
+ | Right now there are these sheets: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here is a template that you can copy to poll for new specific policies that really need their own rules and don't fall under the generic proceedings (Standard, Fast or Extensive), or for even more generic proceedings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
(to be continued) | (to be continued) |
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/euroliquid.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/08 15:44 by bastian