euroliquid
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
euroliquid [2012/08/31 16:40] – robotica | euroliquid [2013/07/21 19:11] – external edit 127.0.0.1 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | The lynX' vision of things is documented on http:// | ||
- | === Preamble === | + | |
+ | ===== Euroliquid Model ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Preamble | ||
This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress" | This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress" | ||
Line 88: | Line 91: | ||
=== Where === | === Where === | ||
^ Permanent Assembly | ^ Permanent Assembly | ||
- | ^ Location | + | ^ Location |
=== LiquidFeedback === | === LiquidFeedback === | ||
Line 94: | Line 97: | ||
LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. | ||
- | ===== Euroliquid | + | ==== Organization ==== |
Line 111: | Line 114: | ||
=== Debate === | === Debate === | ||
- | The two chamber model that follows below has been developed | + | The two chamber model that follows below has been developed |
+ | We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as any other issue of this model. | ||
==== Structure ==== | ==== Structure ==== | ||
Line 158: | Line 162: | ||
* No exception, no complicated rules to remember, easy to understand it. | * No exception, no complicated rules to remember, easy to understand it. | ||
* Reach the goal: balance representativeness of bigger members and give a voice to the smaller ones. | * Reach the goal: balance representativeness of bigger members and give a voice to the smaller ones. | ||
- | * Alredy used for seats distribution of European Parliament ([[euroliquid: | + | * Alredy used for seats distribution of European Parliament ([[euroliquid: |
* Has strong [[euroliquid: | * Has strong [[euroliquid: | ||
Line 185: | Line 189: | ||
\\ | \\ | ||
- | === Subscription and Certification === | + | ==== Subscription and Certification |
Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates. | Euroliquid platform has to be as much reliable as possible on representativeness of the Pirates. | ||
Line 215: | Line 219: | ||
Almost anonymous means that the representers have the autority to ask informations about any pirate to their secretariat to verify if it is real. | Almost anonymous means that the representers have the autority to ask informations about any pirate to their secretariat to verify if it is real. | ||
+ | ==== Chamber of Representers Units ==== | ||
+ | LiquidFeedback can be organized in directory tree to allow selective partecipation voting to the core EU members, to European envolved menbers till the observers depending on the scope of the votation. | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Units == | ||
+ | * Members | ||
+ | * EU Members | ||
+ | * EFTA Members | ||
+ | * Acceding EU Members | ||
+ | * Observers (Europe) | ||
+ | * Observers (non Europe) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Chamber of Pirates Units ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | The chamber of pirates allows to any individual pirate to propose and debeate inside each country /party unit about any issue regarding PP-EU: | ||
+ | |||
+ | The results of those issues must be proposed by their representers to the Chamber of Representers in order to be ratified according to the weights of each party member. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | == Units == | ||
+ | * EU Pirates | ||
+ | * Germany | ||
+ | * France | ||
+ | * United Kingdom | ||
+ | * Italy | ||
+ | * Spain | ||
+ | * Catalunya | ||
+ | * Poland | ||
+ | * Romania | ||
+ | * Netherlands | ||
+ | * Belgium | ||
+ | * Czech Republic | ||
+ | * Greece | ||
+ | * Hungary | ||
+ | * Portugal | ||
+ | * Sweden | ||
+ | * Austria | ||
+ | * Bulgaria | ||
+ | * Finland | ||
+ | * Denmark | ||
+ | * Slovakia | ||
+ | * Ireland | ||
+ | * Lithuania | ||
+ | * Latvia | ||
+ | * Slovenia | ||
+ | * Cyprus | ||
+ | * Estonia | ||
+ | * Luxembourg | ||
+ | * Malta | ||
+ | |||
+ | * EFTA Pirates | ||
+ | * Iceland | ||
+ | * Liechtenstein | ||
+ | * Norway | ||
+ | * Switzerland | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Acceding EU Pirates | ||
+ | * Croatia | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Candidates for EU Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Other European Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Worldwide Pirates | ||
+ | * ... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Policy Poll ===== | ||
+ | by Nuno Cardoso | ||
+ | |||
+ | Just to make it clearer, there is single spreadsheet with several sheets. | ||
+ | Right now there are these sheets: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Here is a template that you can copy to poll for new specific policies that really need their own rules and don't fall under the generic proceedings (Standard, Fast or Extensive), or for even more generic proceedings. | ||
+ | |||
+ | * [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
(to be continued) | (to be continued) |
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/euroliquid.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/08 15:44 by bastian