User Tools

Site Tools


euroliquid

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
euroliquid [2012/08/31 16:42] roboticaeuroliquid [2012/08/31 17:03] – [Principles:] robotica
Line 57: Line 57:
 The lynX' vision of things is documented on http://my.pages.de/euroliquid whereas Robotica's approach follows: The lynX' vision of things is documented on http://my.pages.de/euroliquid whereas Robotica's approach follows:
  
-=== Preamble ===+ 
 +===== Euroliquid Structure ===== 
 + 
 +==== Preamble ====
 This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress". :) This is the summary of many brainstormings held in physical and virtual meetings. This is a "model in progress". :)
  
Line 94: Line 97:
 LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it. LiquidFeedback at the moment is the most complete tool we can dispose and fits our needings. If in the future will arrive a better one we can adopt it.
  
-===== Euroliquid Organization =====+==== Organization ====
  
  
Line 111: Line 114:
 === Debate === === Debate ===
  
-The two chamber model that follows below has been developed by Robotica. It is being discussed as the legitimacy of a first-come-first-served chamber isn't very clear. We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as it models the probabilities of acceptance.+The two chamber model that follows below has been developed to work around the weight assignment to each country /party individuals  
 +We can debate this better in the bootstrap euroliquid, however, as any other issue of this model.
  
 ==== Structure ==== ==== Structure ====
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/euroliquid.txt · Last modified: 2020/12/08 15:44 by bastian