programme:conferences:ceep:proposed_changes
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Next revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
programme:conferences:ceep:proposed_changes [2013/11/08 16:31] – created lunaloof | programme:conferences:ceep:proposed_changes [2013/11/19 17:18] – [PP-GR on Patents] lunaloof | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
====== Proposals for a Change of the CEEP Athens Version ====== | ====== Proposals for a Change of the CEEP Athens Version ====== | ||
- | ===== 1. PP-CZ on Refugee | + | These proposals will be voted upon on the Mumble Conference on the 18./ |
+ | |||
+ | ===== PP-UK on Everything ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[http:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== General Amendments ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Title and Introductory Text==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We suggest to name the document as " | ||
+ | |||
+ | As an introductory text before the Preamble, we like to also add the following text: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //"We, the European Pirate Parties, hereby declare,// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //building up on the foundations of the Uppsala Declaration of 2008,// | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | //that we go into the coming elections of the European Parliament in the year 2014 united.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //We will use the following topics that we identified as being in our common interests as the base platform to work together on European-wide election campaigns and later also in the European Parliament.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //We, the Undersigned, | ||
+ | |||
+ | We need to make sure that it is clear that this text is not a national election programme which needs to be accepted by the GA. There has been a big discussion on the nature of the text that we have been producing in Athens. To ensure that there will be no misunderstandings we would like to add this text. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Preamble ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on the Preamble==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add a paragraph before the Preamble that explains what is this document: | ||
+ | |||
+ | “We, the Pirates Parties from the EU Member States that stand for the next elections for the Parliament of the EU have agreed to a Common | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on the Preamble ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change the Preamble like this: | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | //PIRATES < | ||
+ | //An important goal of all PIRATES will be to fix this and to build a solid democratic foundation for the European Union. In order to achieve < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The EU should live up to its own principles on subsidiarity and decisions should not be taken at an EU level if they can be better resolved on a national, regional or local level.// | ||
+ | //Political decisions at the European level need to be preceded by Europe-wide debates - allowing for adequate participation of all.// //Without equal, non-discriminating communication, | ||
+ | |||
+ | __Explanation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Just grammatical corrections. We'd like to ask PPUK to look further into the whole text of the programme (if you haven' | ||
+ | * Common European space is enough | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Preamble ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We also suggest as an alternative to change the Preamble in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | "(...) common | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Net Policy ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Move last paragraph of the " | ||
+ | (As the first introductory paragraph of the Net Policy section, with no added title.) | ||
+ | |||
+ | “The internet as a new sphere of communication offers tremendous | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Citizen Participation and Open Government ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Democracy Add-On for Europe ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Changes in EU primary legislation (e.g. a treaty) **may** only come into effect, if a majority of EU citizens approve in a simultaneous vote across the EU,” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Changes in EU primary legislation (e.g. a treaty) **should** only come into effect, if a majority of EU citizens approve in a simultaneous vote across the EU,” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Democracy Add-On for Europe ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | See above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Changes in EU primary legislation (e.g. a treaty) **shall** only come into effect, if a majority of EU citizens approve in a simultaneous vote across the EU,” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Better Citizen Direct Participation ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “We want citizen initiatives that can modify constitutions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We want citizen initiatives that can modify constitutions, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Removing Unfair Barriers ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | More specific section title: | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Removal of Unfair Barriers” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Removal of Unfair Barriers **to Political Participation**” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Removing Unfair Barriers ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We propose to strike out the last half-sentence in the topic " | ||
+ | |||
+ | "We PIRATES want a larger and more direct participation of the citizens in the policy debate and decision making process, both individually and collectively. We therefore demand the removal of unfair barriers to the participation of new political parties in the EU elections**< | ||
+ | |||
+ | The reason is that there is no clear position of the German Pirates on the collection of signatures to stand for election. Some Pirates are in favour of having to collect a reasonable amount of signatures to show that the party is a serious one and others are against it completely. If we strike it out, we don't need to decide on the dispute and after all, it doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Transparency ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Transparency of Public Sector ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Modify first sentence in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Transactions of the public sector, including private entities carrying | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “**The activities and** transactions of the **EU administration and national public sectors**, including private entities carrying out by delegation a public role **or receiving a certain amount of income from the public budget,** must be **totally** transparent.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Open Access and Open Data ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Protection of Privacy // Civil Rights ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on Refugee Policy | ||
Add the following text to the CEEP: | Add the following text to the CEEP: | ||
- | //PIRATES propose a fundamental reform of the EU-policy on refugees and asylum. The European approach must be based on the acknowledgement of human rights and fully respect the Geneva Convention on Refugees and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. | + | //PIRATES propose a fundamental reform of the EU-policy on refugees and asylum. The European approach must be based on the acknowledgement of human rights and fully respect the Geneva Convention on Refugees and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.// |
- | All member-states should be equally willing to accept refugees and asylum-seekers according to their financial capacity. No individual member-state should be left alone with the financial, logistic and administrative burden; European solidarity is called for instead. | + | //All member-states should be equally willing to accept refugees and asylum-seekers according to their financial capacity. No individual member-state should be left alone with the financial, logistic and administrative burden; European solidarity is called for instead.// |
- | EU-neigbourhood-policy and EU-development policy should be geared towards lasting improvement of living conditions and focus on the promotion of human rights in all partner countries and regions. We denounce all tendencies to create a repressive apparatus of survey and control in Europe.// | + | //EU-neigbourhood-policy and EU-development policy should be geared towards lasting improvement of living conditions and focus on the promotion of human rights in all partner countries and regions. We denounce all tendencies to create a repressive apparatus of survey and control in Europe.// |
__Explanation: | __Explanation: | ||
Line 21: | Line 146: | ||
* last, the Frontex. It's an unkown issue in the Czech republic therefore it seems really unnecessary in the common program; plus it's only a statement - it doesn' | * last, the Frontex. It's an unkown issue in the Czech republic therefore it seems really unnecessary in the common program; plus it's only a statement - it doesn' | ||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on Ensure Everyone' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Please change the text in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To preserve our historical heritage of freedom rights and to ensure the effectiveness of the security and law enforcement, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Ensure Everyone' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Include reference to European directive in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | “The European directive on storing data **[include reference]** dictates watching and storing information about all telecommunications connections and also about movement of all cellphones.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | Editorial note: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Ensure Everyone' | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Alternative proposal to the one above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | “The **European Data Retention Directive 2006/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Ensure Everyone' | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remove mention to other European pirate parties in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “We, in cooperation with other European | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We, [the] European pirate parties, seek the abolishment of this directive.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Systematic Evaluation of Existing Surveillance Powers and Programmes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word removal in second paragraph of section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “We **may** accept surveillance of citizens in a public space only in clearly | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We accept surveillance of citizens in a public space only in clearly defined cases and only at the necessary minimum level.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Systematic Evaluation of Existing Surveillance Powers and Programmes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Convert bullet point into sentence in third paragraph of section | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Prohibition of wide spying (cameras, communication, | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “**We will work for the** prohibition of wide spying (cameras, communication, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on Systematic Evaluation of Existing Surveillance Powers and Programmes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change the text in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: " | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Systematic Evaluation of Existing Surveillance Powers and Programmes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Convert bullet point into sentence in fourth paragraph of section | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Prohibition of electronic and biological spying.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “**We will work for the** prohibition of electronic and biological spying.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Systematic Evaluation of Existing Surveillance Powers and Programmes ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alternative to the proposal above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “**We will strive for the** prohibition of electronic and biological spying.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Remove Excessive Monitoring ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In article 3, " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “suspicionless, | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “suspicionless, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on Remove Excessive Monitoring ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change the text in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: "3. Remove Excessive Monitoring | ||
+ | |||
+ | We want to abolish unnecessary and excessive surveillance of the EU, including: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * suspicionless, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the use of biometrics in passports and visas, also with asylum seekers | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the transfer of passenger and payment data to third countries such as the USA and generally, the delivery of personal data to countries without effective protection of fundamental rights | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **the compulsory introduction of digital metering devices (“smart meters”) without the affected persons having a choice** | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the enhanced surveillance of external borders (“Eurosur”) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the cross-border access to police data (“principle of availability”) without a strong and effective European data protection and protection of fundamental rights." | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: "3. Remove excessive monitoring | ||
+ | |||
+ | We want to abolish unnecessary and excessive surveillance of the EU, including: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * suspicionless, | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the use of biometrics in passports and visas, also with asylum seekers | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the transfer of passenger and payment data to third countries such as the USA and generally, the delivery of personal data to countries without effective protection of fundamental rights | ||
+ | |||
+ | * < | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **the compulsory introduction of any industrial system automatically processing personal/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the enhanced surveillance of external borders (“Eurosur”) | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the cross-border access to police data (“principle of availability”) without a strong and effective European data protection and protection of fundamental rights | ||
+ | |||
+ | **At the same time, we want to enforce:** | ||
+ | |||
+ | * **strict standards for any industrial systems automatically processing personal/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PPCZ explanation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on European Data Protection Regulation With a High Level of Data Protection ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add after the second paragraph: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **" | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | PPCZ explanation: | ||
+ | Example of this is well-known case of Facebook, and information about number of people visiting one's profile. It is absolutely ok for Facebook to decide to not disclose this information to it's users: but once this information is traded with any third party (like advertisers, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-FR on Unify Police Standard Procedures Towards more | ||
+ | progressive ones ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | About the paragraph "Unify Police Standard Procedures Towards more | ||
+ | progressive ones" | ||
+ | |||
+ | The first sentence ist really vague and we don't see any possibility to | ||
+ | apply it concretly, because there is many way to understand it. | ||
+ | Furthermore, | ||
+ | one (until we have a european police...). | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Free Software, Libre Culture and Free Knowledge ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Mandatory Use of Free Software in Public Administration ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “We will **initiate** the migration of the public sector to free software | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We will **enforce** the migration of the public sector to free software which doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Mandatory Use of Free Software in Public Administration ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alternatives to the Proposal above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We will **drive** the migration of the public sector to free software which doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | or | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We will **implement** the migration of the public sector to free software which doesn' | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Promotion of the Commons ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Move section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | “Promotion of the Commons We want to work towards provisions in trade agreements which support the use and development of open formats and free libre open source software | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Copyright ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CZ on Copyright ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Change the text on Copyright in the following way: | ||
+ | |||
+ | // | ||
+ | |||
+ | //We, the European Pirates, want a fair and balanced copyright law based on the interests of society as a whole.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //We strive for abolition of information monopolies. Information monopolies prevent people from sharing and using information. The politicians have given in to a series of information monopolies that supposedly motivate creators, inventors and producers to be more active. In reality though, the only < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //We therefore demand that copying, providing access to, storing and using literary and artistic production for non-commercial purposes must not < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The commercial monopoly given by copyright should be restored to a reasonable term. Derivative works shall always be permitted, with exceptions < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The internet as a communicative space knows no borders. PIRATES consider artificial national barriers for cultural goods within the European internal market < | ||
+ | |||
+ | //The creation of so-called “commons”, | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Social life, increasingly taking place in digital spaces, must not be restricted by rights to immaterial goods. “Fair-Use Regulations” will ensure that. We demand European standards for copyright contracts to strengthen the position of creators versus processing and collecting entities and to create a balance in the interest of the general public.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | //European collecting societies must ensure comprehensive transparency and fair participatory rights for their members.// | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | __Explanation: | ||
+ | |||
+ | * Just grammatical corrections. We'd like to ask PPUK to look further into the whole text of the programme (if you haven' | ||
+ | * Explain or cross out the orphan works, it's not sure, what is the problem | ||
+ | * https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Copyright ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in fifth paragraph of section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “The internet as a communicative space **knows** no borders.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “The internet as a communicative space **should know** no borders.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Copyright ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in sixth paragraph of section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Social life, increasingly taking place in digital spaces, must not be | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Social life, increasingly taking place in digital spaces, must not be restricted by rights to immaterial goods. “Fair-Use Regulations” **should ensure** that.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Copyright ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alternative to the proposal above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Social life, increasingly taking place in digital spaces, must not be restricted by rights to immaterial goods. “Fair-Use Regulations” **shall ensure** that.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Patents ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-GR on Patents ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Please add the following paragraph to the CEEP: | ||
+ | |||
+ | //" | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Health must be regarded as the most important commodity for the citizens of each European State and its visitors. Universities and Institutes should be able to carry out scientific research for Health and Medicine without being encumbered by patents. Patents for Health and Medicines should expire before every other patent."// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Reasoning: The effect of patents on health and the price of medicine is an important point, and from our point of view it is worthy of a bit more emphasis. This is also an argument we often use when explaining the every day side effects of patents to ordinary people. | ||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Patents in the Information Age ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in last paragraph of section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “We want freer and fairer markets without the limitations of current patent law, which therefore needs to be reformed or replaced with an approach that **actually makes sense, instead of one that further stifles innovation**.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “We want freer and fairer markets without the limitations of current patent law, which therefore needs to be reformed or replaced with an approach that **actually promotes innovation, instead of one that further stifles it**.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Even if the patenting of industrial goods in the past is **generally seen as** a success story (neither provable nor refutable), | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Even if the patenting of industrial goods in the past is **often assumed to have been** a success story (neither provable nor refutable), | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-PL on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Add to the above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | "In many fields the growth of the number of granted patents made | ||
+ | checking existing patents when building new inventions impractical and | ||
+ | turned innovative business into a game of ambushes where overbroad, | ||
+ | cryptic and often trivial patents are used to attack competition | ||
+ | instead of extending the common knowledge by public disclosure." | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “The increasing international competition also leads to an increasingly misappropriated use of the patent system, where you often can not see a compensation for the society any more.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “The increasing international competition also leads to an increasingly misappropriated use of the patent system, where you often can not see a **large enough** compensation for the society any more **that balances the negative impact**.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alternative to the proposal above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “The increasing international competition also leads to an increasingly misappropriated use of the patent system, where you often can not see a **sufficient** compensation for the society any more **that balances the negative impact**.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remove repetition in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | The crossed bit is repeated again below: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ”**< | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Alternative to the proposal above: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ”**< | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Remove word in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | “This **< | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Degradation of Private Monopolies and Opening Markets ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Patents on pharmaceuticals **also have some impact** that is | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Patents on pharmaceuticals **often have an impact** on public health that is ethically highly reprehensible.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Patents in the Information Society ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Word change in second paragraph of section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | From: “Patents should definitely never be given for things that are trivial, non-substantial**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | To: “Patents should definitely never be given for things that are trivial, non-substantial**, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on International Regulation of Intellectual Monopolies ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Move section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | “International Regulation of Intellectual Monopolies We PIRATES strive for a revision of the TRIPS Agreement in favour of reducing exclusive rights on immaterial goods, especially in patent and copyright regulations, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Net Policy ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Legal Guarantee for Anonymous Access to the Internet ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We like to reintroduce the following topic which was rejected in Athens: | ||
+ | |||
+ | "Legal Guarantee for Anonymous, Pseudonymous and Autonymous Access to Network Services | ||
+ | | ||
+ | We PIRATES reject a constraint to use legal names on the Internet. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | We are committed to guarantee | ||
+ | |||
+ | And suggest as an alternative proposal instead: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **" | ||
+ | |||
+ | We PIRATES reject a constraint to use legal names on the Internet. | ||
+ | | ||
+ | We are committed to guarantee citizens the anonymous access to the Internet by law. The freedom of expression and self-definition of a person may not be curtailed for reasons of ostensible safety." | ||
+ | |||
+ | Like this we will leave out the disputed point about how to identify trolls in forums and kick them out effectively. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== International Trade Policy ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-CAT on Comprehensive Information and Public Hearings ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Addition in section " | ||
+ | |||
+ | “The European Parliament needs to be informed right from the start and comprehensively about the state and the strategy of negotiation **of Trade Agreements**.” | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-FR on Taking in Account the | ||
+ | interest of small and medium-sized companies ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | About the paragraph on International Trade, " | ||
+ | interest of small and medium-sized companies" | ||
+ | |||
+ | The line:" The EU should be more active in enforcing anti-monopoly and pro-competition policies " | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Energy Policy ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== PP-DE on Energy Policy ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We will veto the text on energy policy, even if all the text is taken from the German proposal. There has been a heated discussion in the German Pirate Party about the question, if we should have any position on energy policy at all, if we don't have a clear commitment against nuclear power as a part of it. As the opinion was divided and it is a topic close to the heart of many German Pirates we will rather veto the topic than lose support for the CEEP as a whole. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Other Provisions ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ |
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/programme/conferences/ceep/proposed_changes.txt · Last modified: 2023/06/27 12:11 by mab