PPEU wiki

User Tools

Site Tools

You are here: start » 1st_council_meeting_2015 » statutes_changes
Trace: • minutes20120612 • minutes20120628
1st_council_meeting_2015:statutes_changes

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision		Previous revision
Last revisionBoth sides next revision
1st_council_meeting_2015:statutes_changes [2015/06/28 17:00] – [Manifest changes] vojtechpikal1st_council_meeting_2015:statutes_changes [2015/06/28 17:09] – [Better election procedures] vojtechpikal
Line 53: Line 53:
  
 **Rational:** The election procedures as listed in statutes are clunky, may result into deadlock or some unfairness. (i.e. tree or more candidates getting the same number of votes, two or more candidates with second highest number of votes..)\\ **Rational:** The election procedures as listed in statutes are clunky, may result into deadlock or some unfairness. (i.e. tree or more candidates getting the same number of votes, two or more candidates with second highest number of votes..)\\
-It is reasonable to put just the provisions for election process into statutes and specify the rest in Rules of Procedure.+It is reasonable to put just the provisions for election process into statutes and specify the rest in Rules of Procedure.\\ 
 +Also, my version is shorter and better unerstandable.
 ==== Inactivity of Board member by Board itself ==== ==== Inactivity of Board member by Board itself ====
 **Proposant:** PP-CZ (Vojtěch Pikal) **Proposant:** PP-CZ (Vojtěch Pikal)
Line 83: Line 84:
  
 |//insert at the end of [Article 14 - Composition and Powers of the Council]//\\ \\ (11) The Board may organise an online referendum of the Council to deal with an urgent question to bypass the one month minimum delay. In such cases, the Board shall write a unique proposal that the Council will vote on. The Council members will be asked to either accept or reject the proposal. Alternatively they can refuse to vote this proposal in urgence by abstaining. The votes will be opened for one week, but the Board can chose to enter its result into force as soon as a majority would be reached for the acceptance or the reject of the proposal. If no majority is found at the end of one week, the proposal will be added to the agenda of the next Council meeting. This procedure for urgent voting cannot be used for matters related to memberships, statute amendments and pirate manifesto, or dissolution of the association. | |//insert at the end of [Article 14 - Composition and Powers of the Council]//\\ \\ (11) The Board may organise an online referendum of the Council to deal with an urgent question to bypass the one month minimum delay. In such cases, the Board shall write a unique proposal that the Council will vote on. The Council members will be asked to either accept or reject the proposal. Alternatively they can refuse to vote this proposal in urgence by abstaining. The votes will be opened for one week, but the Board can chose to enter its result into force as soon as a majority would be reached for the acceptance or the reject of the proposal. If no majority is found at the end of one week, the proposal will be added to the agenda of the next Council meeting. This procedure for urgent voting cannot be used for matters related to memberships, statute amendments and pirate manifesto, or dissolution of the association. |
 +
 +=== [Proposal S5-c] Extraordinary council meetings and referendums ===
 +
 +**Proposant:** PP-CZ (Vojtěch Pikal)
 +
 +**Proposed change:**
 ===== Manifesto changes ===== ===== Manifesto changes =====
  
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/pages/1st_council_meeting_2015/statutes_changes.txt · Last modified: 2015/06/28 18:12 by vojtechpikal