pp-eu:board-meeting08_08
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| pp-eu:board-meeting08_08 [2023/11/21 07:15] – created alessandro | pp-eu:board-meeting08_08 [2023/11/21 07:49] (current) – alessandro | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 49: | Line 49: | ||
| 0.2 Election of meeting Secretary\\ | 0.2 Election of meeting Secretary\\ | ||
| 0.3. Approval of the agenda\\ | 0.3. Approval of the agenda\\ | ||
| - | 0.4. Approval of the minutes of the last meeting: | + | 0.4. Approval of the minutes of the last meeting: |
| 0.5 Confirmation of any decisions taken in between meetings\\ | 0.5 Confirmation of any decisions taken in between meetings\\ | ||
| 0.6 Written reports \\ | 0.6 Written reports \\ | ||
| Line 120: | Line 120: | ||
| **Jan Mareš, Board Member**\\ | **Jan Mareš, Board Member**\\ | ||
| - | *Letter from the PPCZ regarding CEEP ratification. Short Timeline: | + | Letter from the PPCZ regarding CEEP ratification. Short Timeline: |
| - | 1) The letter is a product of the PPCZ Republican Committee, a 30-member body elected by the members. It is a counterweight body to the PPCZ Executive Board, and has amongst other things the power to formally create ratify election programs.\\ | + | 1) The letter is a product of the PPCZ Republican Committee, a 30-member body elected by the members. It is a counterweight body to the PPCZ Executive Board, and has amongst other things the power to formally create ratify election programs.\\ |
| - | 2) The Committee was aware of the CEEP creation, it's members were invited to take part many times, starting in Winter 22/23.\\ | + | 2) The Committee was aware of the CEEP creation, it's members were invited to take part many times, starting in Winter 22/23.\\ |
| - | 3) Serious discussion of CEEP only began in late August - Foreign Minister Lipavsky (member of the Committee) voiced several objections and recommended initially to decline ratification partially or entirely\\ | + | 3) Serious discussion of CEEP only began in late August - Foreign Minister Lipavsky (member of the Committee) voiced several objections and recommended initially to decline ratification partially or entirely\\ |
| - | 3.1) Many objections were not based on PPCZ Programme, but on difference of personal opinions (i.e. Lipavsky wanted to step back from Pirate insistence on abolishing Unanimity (Veto powers) in EU decision making)\\ | + | 3.1) Many objections were not based on PPCZ Programme, but on difference of personal opinions (i.e. Lipavsky wanted to step back from Pirate insistence on abolishing Unanimity (Veto powers) in EU decision making)\\ |
| 3.2) Most objections were aimed at parts of CEEP coordinated by Czech MEPs, the debate coincided with PPCZ Primary elections with Lipavsky backing alternative candidates to Mikulaš, Markéta, Marcel.\\ | 3.2) Most objections were aimed at parts of CEEP coordinated by Czech MEPs, the debate coincided with PPCZ Primary elections with Lipavsky backing alternative candidates to Mikulaš, Markéta, Marcel.\\ | ||
| 3.3) PPCZ is in process of update of it's "Long Term Programme Statement" | 3.3) PPCZ is in process of update of it's "Long Term Programme Statement" | ||
/var/www/wiki.ppeu.net/web/data/attic/pp-eu/board-meeting08_08.1700550938.txt · Last modified: 2023/11/21 07:15 by alessandro